We’ve Got to Stop Calling Daoism a ‘Superstition’

We’ve Got to Stop Calling Daoism a ‘Superstition’
Self-proclaimed progressives are fueling suspicion of China’s homegrown religion.
Zhu Yiwen, May 23, 2018 

Last month, contractors for the Chinese Academy of Sciences’ nuclear power station in Wuwei, northwestern China’s Gansu province, invited local Daoist monks to perform a foundation-laying ceremony at the station’s construction site. Somewhat unexpectedly, this seemingly banal event snowballed into a media furor that pit the country’s religious revivalists against those who believe in scientific progress.

Soon after the ceremony, several media outlets labeled the Daoist ritual “superstitious” and claimed that it went against the academy’s scientific values. Opponents decried Daoist practices as “backward” and “absurd” — claims that drew the ire of Daoism’s resurgent numbers of followers.

To be precise, the ritual performed that day is known as “Pacifying the Dragons and Making Offerings to the God of the Earth.” Daoism teaches us that large-scale construction unsettles local spirits and earthly deities, and contractors must both pacify them before construction begins and make offerings to the earth god once construction is complete.

But in Chinese terms, this isn’t superstition. In fact, the Chinese word for “superstition,” mixin, combines the characters for “lost, confused, or fascinated” and “belief.” It wasn’t until the 19th century that it took on the opposite meaning to kexue — “science” — and since then has referred to blind, uncomprehending, or fanatical forms of faith, not to Daoism’s systematic religious and philosophical beliefs.

After the collapse of the Qing Dynasty and the subsequent failure of an independent Chinese republic in the early 20th century, a group of thinkers allied with the New Culture Movement weaponized the term mixinas an umbrella term for purportedly irrational and unscientific beliefs. Certain influential intellectuals connected China’s weakness on the global stage to widespread support for traditional religions and customs, which would have to be eradicated if China were to become powerful again. In the febrile political atmosphere of the time, Daoism and folk religions were lambasted as barriers to social progress.

The New Culture Movement profoundly shaped Chinese politics and social customs, and Daoists experienced several waves of persecution throughout the 20th century as a result of the vilification of their beliefs. Prior to the reunification of China under Communist rule in 1949, the Kuomintang government suppressed Daoist practices. Later, during the Cultural Revolution, Daoist practitioners were targeted for upholding “feudal” beliefs that supposedly ran counter to the ideals of socialism.

In the wake of last month’s outcry, the Daoist community has largely sought to redress the pigeonholing of their beliefs and reaffirm Daoism’s centuries-old cultural underpinnings in China. Tao Jin, a Daoist who works to build temples across China, wrote an article for The Paper, Sixth Tone’s sister publication, claiming that foundation-laying rituals are a uniquely Chinese expression of reverence for the natural world. In the same vein, a widely shared online poster written by the internet persona “Yi Yu Shi” claimed that as the only religion to have originated in China, “Daoism is a vessel for traditional national culture. Daoist theurgy is not witchcraft, nor is it superstitious.”

In the wake of last month’s outcry, the Daoist community has largely sought to redress the pigeonholing of their beliefs and reaffirm Daoism’s centuries-old cultural underpinnings in China. Tao Jin, a Daoist who works to build temples across China, wrote an article for The Paper, Sixth Tone’s sister publication, claiming that foundation-laying rituals are a uniquely Chinese expression of reverence for the natural world. In the same vein, a widely shared online poster written by the internet persona “Yi Yu Shi” claimed that as the only religion to have originated in China, “Daoism is a vessel for traditional national culture. Daoist theurgy is not witchcraft, nor is it superstitious.”

The above quotation was actually adapted from a 2010 academic article by Li Zhihong, a member of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. Li’s reportgoes to great lengths to rebut underlying suspicions that Daoism is pure superstition. He is at pains to distinguish Daoist alchemy from witchcraft — for example, claiming that Daoist techniques of maintaining longevity may be unscientific, but they are effective in limited ways. Li concludes that the revival of Daoism requires the “sympathy and understanding” of the media — something that was certainly lacking in the aftermath of last month’s ceremony.

But perhaps the most offensive response to the foundation-laying ceremony came from the commentator Jiang Meng in Party mouthpiece People’s Daily. In an eviscerating piece, Jiang dubbed the Daoist priest who led the ritual “just some local farmer,” called him and his ilk “fraudsters,” and equated their religious practices with pagan “spirit-dances.” Yet all Jiang demonstrated was his own lack of basic understanding.

I lament the ignorance and disrespect that many of my fellow Chinese people continue to demonstrate toward Daoism. But I also fear that Daoist conservatives — the kind who head up the country’s religious associations — will grow tired of reacting to public suspicion with openness and warmth, and will instead try to defend Daoism from a purely nationalist standpoint. As China’s sole homegrown religion, Daoism is fertile ground to be claimed by hyper-patriotic revivalists of traditional Chinese culture. It is essential that Daoists remain level-headed and oppose radical and exclusionary political attitudes.

Currently, the Daoist community is broadly discussing how to adapt our beliefs to the profound changes taking place in Chinese society. The foundation-laying ceremony in Gansu reminds us that, at a time when religious affairs easily ignite controversy in the public domain, Daoists must act with caution and practice their beliefs in appropriate, transparent ways that seek to unify people, not divide them.

Translator: Lewis Wright; editors: Wu Haiyun and Matthew Walsh.

原创文章,作者:清风子,如若转载,请注明出处:http://qingfengguan.com/1082

(0)
打赏 微信扫一扫 微信扫一扫
清风子的头像清风子
上一篇 2019年6月1日
下一篇 2019年6月2日

相关推荐

  • 同样是做科普,中美两国有何异同?| 贾鹤鹏

    9月14日~20日,一年一度的全国科普日系列活动又热火朝天地展开了。前不久,我撰写了“解码科学传播”系列专栏文章的第一篇《中国科学传播做对了什么》。文中简单提了下中美科学传播的主要…

    2019年11月8日
    727
  • 道教碑文资料库

    道教碑文资料库:https://www.daobei.info

    2021年11月27日
    506
  • 长时间玩手机,对身体的危害不止这4个!你能全躲过吗

    随着现在科技的发展,人们娱乐的东西根本就不怎么缺了,比如电脑这些。虽然这些东西能让人娱乐,但是同时也能让人沉迷其中无法自拔,特别是智能手机,其强大的功能和可玩性无不吸引着各个年龄的…

    2019年10月26日
    547
  • 隆基绿能2024年1季度亏损23亿元

    隆基绿能披露一季报,公司2024年第一季度实现营业收入176.74亿元,同比下降37.59%;净利润为亏损23.5亿元,上年同期净利润36.37亿元。报告期内,组件、硅片价格下降,…

    2024年5月12日
    159
  • 道教小知识:我命由我不由天

    道教养生的主体精神,可以用一句话来概括:“我命在我不在天”。在道教中,不管是道教的教义还是打坐修炼、炼丹服食、行气导引,无不在体现这种精神。道教经典书籍不管是《养性延命录》还是《真…

    2019年5月28日
    765
  • [E0073]三才发秘

    此《三才发秘》清陈雯撰。此书包含星卦、命理、风水等内容,分天部2卷(天部原理、天部选择),地部3卷(地理理气、地部形法、地部阳宅),人部4卷(人部禄命、人部五星、人部河洛、人部皇极…

    2012年4月19日
    575
  • 农村俗语”不色者肾绝,不食者脾绝,不言者气绝”,到底什么含义?

    有人问,农村俗语“不色者肾绝,不食者脾绝,不言者气绝”是什么意思?有道理吗?笔者认为,这句话还是有些道理的,这些俗语往往包含民间智慧,其中不乏生活经历和养生经验的总结,所谓高手在民…

    2019年11月9日
    356
  • [E0066]中华仙学养生全书

    《中华仙学养生全书》是胡海牙先生继《仙学必读》、《仙学辑要》二书出版后,奉献给广大仙学爱好者的又一部力作。《中华仙学养生全书》包括影印版《扬善半月刊》、《仙道月报》合集与《陈撄宁仙…

    2015年5月29日
    702
  • 元始八威龙文经

    经名:元始八威龙文经。撰人不详。一卷。底本出处:《正统道藏》洞真部本文类。 元始八威龙文经 第一 不得而名道之初,可得而形道之余,知初者合元始之祖,知余者契阴阳之枢,混而一之可与天…

    2022年10月9日
    423
  • [E0041]冲虚真经

    《冲虚真经》即《列子》,又名《冲虚至德真经》,原为中国战国时道家着作,相传为列御寇所作。今存《列子》一书据考应为魏晋时玄学家伪作,东晋张湛收集整理,编为八篇,并为之作注。此本为日本…

    2014年7月21日
    589
联系我们

最新联系方式

邮箱:info@daomen.net

微信:colddao

电话:13909185601

QQ:97523900

分享本页
返回顶部