We’ve Got to Stop Calling Daoism a ‘Superstition’

We’ve Got to Stop Calling Daoism a ‘Superstition’
Self-proclaimed progressives are fueling suspicion of China’s homegrown religion.
Zhu Yiwen, May 23, 2018 

Last month, contractors for the Chinese Academy of Sciences’ nuclear power station in Wuwei, northwestern China’s Gansu province, invited local Daoist monks to perform a foundation-laying ceremony at the station’s construction site. Somewhat unexpectedly, this seemingly banal event snowballed into a media furor that pit the country’s religious revivalists against those who believe in scientific progress.

Soon after the ceremony, several media outlets labeled the Daoist ritual “superstitious” and claimed that it went against the academy’s scientific values. Opponents decried Daoist practices as “backward” and “absurd” — claims that drew the ire of Daoism’s resurgent numbers of followers.

To be precise, the ritual performed that day is known as “Pacifying the Dragons and Making Offerings to the God of the Earth.” Daoism teaches us that large-scale construction unsettles local spirits and earthly deities, and contractors must both pacify them before construction begins and make offerings to the earth god once construction is complete.

But in Chinese terms, this isn’t superstition. In fact, the Chinese word for “superstition,” mixin, combines the characters for “lost, confused, or fascinated” and “belief.” It wasn’t until the 19th century that it took on the opposite meaning to kexue — “science” — and since then has referred to blind, uncomprehending, or fanatical forms of faith, not to Daoism’s systematic religious and philosophical beliefs.

After the collapse of the Qing Dynasty and the subsequent failure of an independent Chinese republic in the early 20th century, a group of thinkers allied with the New Culture Movement weaponized the term mixinas an umbrella term for purportedly irrational and unscientific beliefs. Certain influential intellectuals connected China’s weakness on the global stage to widespread support for traditional religions and customs, which would have to be eradicated if China were to become powerful again. In the febrile political atmosphere of the time, Daoism and folk religions were lambasted as barriers to social progress.

The New Culture Movement profoundly shaped Chinese politics and social customs, and Daoists experienced several waves of persecution throughout the 20th century as a result of the vilification of their beliefs. Prior to the reunification of China under Communist rule in 1949, the Kuomintang government suppressed Daoist practices. Later, during the Cultural Revolution, Daoist practitioners were targeted for upholding “feudal” beliefs that supposedly ran counter to the ideals of socialism.

In the wake of last month’s outcry, the Daoist community has largely sought to redress the pigeonholing of their beliefs and reaffirm Daoism’s centuries-old cultural underpinnings in China. Tao Jin, a Daoist who works to build temples across China, wrote an article for The Paper, Sixth Tone’s sister publication, claiming that foundation-laying rituals are a uniquely Chinese expression of reverence for the natural world. In the same vein, a widely shared online poster written by the internet persona “Yi Yu Shi” claimed that as the only religion to have originated in China, “Daoism is a vessel for traditional national culture. Daoist theurgy is not witchcraft, nor is it superstitious.”

In the wake of last month’s outcry, the Daoist community has largely sought to redress the pigeonholing of their beliefs and reaffirm Daoism’s centuries-old cultural underpinnings in China. Tao Jin, a Daoist who works to build temples across China, wrote an article for The Paper, Sixth Tone’s sister publication, claiming that foundation-laying rituals are a uniquely Chinese expression of reverence for the natural world. In the same vein, a widely shared online poster written by the internet persona “Yi Yu Shi” claimed that as the only religion to have originated in China, “Daoism is a vessel for traditional national culture. Daoist theurgy is not witchcraft, nor is it superstitious.”

The above quotation was actually adapted from a 2010 academic article by Li Zhihong, a member of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. Li’s reportgoes to great lengths to rebut underlying suspicions that Daoism is pure superstition. He is at pains to distinguish Daoist alchemy from witchcraft — for example, claiming that Daoist techniques of maintaining longevity may be unscientific, but they are effective in limited ways. Li concludes that the revival of Daoism requires the “sympathy and understanding” of the media — something that was certainly lacking in the aftermath of last month’s ceremony.

But perhaps the most offensive response to the foundation-laying ceremony came from the commentator Jiang Meng in Party mouthpiece People’s Daily. In an eviscerating piece, Jiang dubbed the Daoist priest who led the ritual “just some local farmer,” called him and his ilk “fraudsters,” and equated their religious practices with pagan “spirit-dances.” Yet all Jiang demonstrated was his own lack of basic understanding.

I lament the ignorance and disrespect that many of my fellow Chinese people continue to demonstrate toward Daoism. But I also fear that Daoist conservatives — the kind who head up the country’s religious associations — will grow tired of reacting to public suspicion with openness and warmth, and will instead try to defend Daoism from a purely nationalist standpoint. As China’s sole homegrown religion, Daoism is fertile ground to be claimed by hyper-patriotic revivalists of traditional Chinese culture. It is essential that Daoists remain level-headed and oppose radical and exclusionary political attitudes.

Currently, the Daoist community is broadly discussing how to adapt our beliefs to the profound changes taking place in Chinese society. The foundation-laying ceremony in Gansu reminds us that, at a time when religious affairs easily ignite controversy in the public domain, Daoists must act with caution and practice their beliefs in appropriate, transparent ways that seek to unify people, not divide them.

Translator: Lewis Wright; editors: Wu Haiyun and Matthew Walsh.

原创文章,作者:清风子,如若转载,请注明出处:http://qingfengguan.com/1082

(0)
打赏 微信扫一扫 微信扫一扫
清风子的头像清风子
上一篇 2019年6月1日
下一篇 2019年6月2日

相关推荐

  • Chrome浏览器保存整个网页为图片

    打开需要保存为图片的网页,然后按F12,打开调试模式,接着按Ctrl+Shift+P,在框内输入full, 点击下面的“Capture full size screenshot”或…

    2022年9月16日
    549
  • 天隐子

    经名:《天隐子》。原题司马承祯述,约成书于南北朝末至唐朝前期。共分八章,全书分为神仙第一、易简第二、渐门第三、斋戒第四、安处第五、存想第六、坐忘第七、神解第八。讲述神仙之道以长生为…

    2022年10月16日
    321
  • The Useless Tree

    ANCIENT CHINESE THOUGHT IN MODERN AMERICAN LIFE https://uselesstree.typepad.com/useless_tr…

    2022年9月23日
    432
  • 清规玄妙全真参访集

    清规玄妙全真参访集第一章 清规玄妙全真参访外集右集纂自碧云子,而订正于逍遥客。我山僻在吴兴,金盖道从乐闻,爰为重梓。闵小艮敬跋。规矩须知天府考校仙裔法派。道有宗源,仙有法派。法派不…

    2022年10月10日
    562
  • 五篇灵文

    五篇灵文 重阳祖师注  清虚道人录 序 斯文乃金丹之至宝,非其人而不可传也,若上根上器大德之子,得遇此书,修仙之正路耳。 重阳注曰:仙有五等,鬼仙不可取,人仙不必论,地仙住世长年,…

    2013年5月27日
    516
  • “凝神入气穴”要旨探析

    “凝神入气穴”要旨探析 盛克琦 昔日遇师亲口诀,只要凝神入气穴。 以精化气气化神,炼作黄芽并白雪。 ——宋.薛道光《还丹复命篇》​ 自南派内丹学大师薛道光(1078-1191)提出…

    2022年1月16日
    638
  • 新华时评:利用中国稀土制造产品遏制中国发展,妄想!

    新华社北京5月28日电 题:利用中国稀土制造产品遏制中国发展,妄想!新华社记者安蓓在产业分工高度全球化的今天,没有协同合作就没有发展进步。再先进的技术产品也是经济全球化这棵大树结出…

    2019年5月29日
    340
  • [E0009]道藏精华录

    道藏精华录​ 《道藏精华录》,丁福保编辑,曾于民国期间铅印出版。编者有鉴于道教典籍浩如烟海,卷帙庞大,内容博杂,不易披阅,故精选正续《道藏》及藏外道教著作中义理纯正,于摄生炼养、人…

    2016年1月13日
    521
  • 我们努力奔跑,只为了留在原地。

    我们努力奔跑,只为了留在原地。​ 大江奔流的时代,你如果浑浑噩噩,把混日子当成是岁月静好,那等待你的绝不仅仅是落后。 这个世界,从不按照套路出牌。乌鸦喝水的故事我们都听过,一只老乌…

    2022年10月7日
    323
  • 十四经穴歌

    针灸是中医疾病治疗的一种重要手法,有悠久历史。至今仍是一种治疗方法。此清代钞本《十四经穴歌》详细叙述人体十四经脉以及穴位,即人体上可针灸之处。本书中前十二经中只有经穴图(十一经脉均…

    2022年10月16日
    287
联系我们

最新联系方式

邮箱:info@daomen.net

微信:colddao

电话:13909185601

QQ:97523900

分享本页
返回顶部